I Can Do the Math!
May 21st, 2010 by Angela
I was listening to Christian Radio the other day, to a broadcast by “Revive Our Hearts” by Nancy Leigh DeMoss, entitled, “What Submission Does and Does Not Mean.” I am posting an excerpt out of her transcript below, and do so, because I found it absolutely incredible what she had to say about Jesus’ submission to His Heavenly Father and God.
“The submission of Christ to His Father, that is a fascinating thing to study in the Scripture. It’s a humbling thing to study. Because Christ is co-equal, co-eternal with God, in no sense inferior to God the Father. They are one. But Jesus says, and it’s written in Psalm 40, “Behold, I have come; in the scroll of the book it is written of me: I delight to do your will, O my God; your law is within my heart.” Jesus said He came to earth to do the will of His heavenly Father, to submit Himself to His heavenly Father voluntarily, not under coercion. John 6:38, Jesus said, “I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will but the will of Him who sent me.”
The submission of Christ. We read about it in Philippians 2. Christ “humbled Himself by becoming obedient.” Humility and submission go hand in hand. He became obedient even to the point of death when His Father said this is what I want you to do for the sake of My glory and My redemptive plan on earth. Jesus said, “Yes, Lord. Yes, My God. I will do that. I will submit eagerly, willingly, gladly to Your will. I delight to do Your will.” Not only in coming to this earth in the incarnation and not only in going to the cross, but for all of eternity Jesus will be in submissive relationship to the God with whom He is equal. WE CANNOT DO THE MATH ON THAT, but it’s what the Scripture teaches.
I love this passage in 1 Corinthians 15 that pictures this in the end time. Then comes the end, when he delivers the kingdom to God the Father after destroying every rule and every authority and power. For he [that is Christ] must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet. . . . When all things are subjected to him, then the Son himself will also be subjected to him [that is to his father] who put all things in subjection under him that God may be all in all” (1 Corinthians 15:24-25, 28). Jesus says for all of eternity, My God, I delight to do Your will. When we submit to God-ordained authority, and as women to God-ordained male authority, we are picturing to the world the beautiful, powerful, passionate submission of Christ to His heavenly Father, that God may be all in all.”
I found it profoundly disturbing how mindful DeMoss was to make sure she stated the church creed of an incarnated god into man, which was still co-equal and co-eternal and not inferior to God the Father, yet at the same time, build a very logical case about how Jesus was actually inferior to His God and must submit to His greater authority in all things, to the point of death.
DeMoss actually defines submission as the following:
The word submit comes from a Greek word, hupotasso. A compound word. Hupo means “under;” tasso “to line up or to get in order or to arrange.” To arrange under. It’s a military term that means to rank beneath or under.
The first thing we need to realize about submission is that God has established order, headship, authority and submission in every sphere of life. In the home, in the church, in the workplace, in the government. Submission is not just for women. Submission is for men. Submission is for young, for old, for married, for single. Everybody has to be under submission to one or more human authorities in their lives and all of us under submission to God’s ultimate sovereign authority.
Yes, indeed. Submission means to be under rank of another. The mere definition of this is great evidence that Jesus, the Son of God, is under the authority of the Heavenly Father, God. There is no co-equality in this relationship. There never was, and as DeMoss said so herself, “for all of eternity Jesus will be in submissive relationship to the God with whom He is equal. WE CANNOT DO THE MATH ON THAT, but it’s what the Scripture teaches.”
DeMoss’s teaching is wonderful proof that what churches are teaching and clinging to – the traditional creed that Jesus is a third person of a co-equal, co-eternal godhead of a Trinity – is in direct conflict with Scripture! DeMoss attempts to teach Biblical Scripture and teaches it, yet it is does not line up with what her church has determined is the litmus test for all Christianity: that we must accept Jesus pre-existed as God, before he became a man-God on earth. It is an absolutely preposterous, illogical teaching, and the very definition of submission rips this doctrine to shreds. I don’t even have to argue my case. DeMoss has done it for me.
She states that she cannot do the math, when the Bible states that Jesus is going to be in submission to God for all eternity, because her Trinity doctrine teaches that Jesus is equal to the Father, yet, how can they be equal, when Jesus is obviously down a peg in the authority chain of command, for all eternity? It doesn’t add up. It doesn’t make any sense. But, dear Miss DeMoss, I can do the math for you!! I was a finance major in college, but I certainly don’t need a degree to know this simple math. A preschooler can even do it. One means one. Not 1 + 1 + 1 = 3! No, the truth is that 1 = 1. There is only one God. That God IS the Father. Jesus is His Son. When you understand this simple explanation, there is no problem. There is no wondering, “hmmm, how will God the Son, who is co-equal with God the Father, be in submission to God, for all of eternity?” Only people who are so entrenched in this Trinity doctrine have a problem with understanding this. Others who see Scripture for its face value, and do no read the Church’s confusing, man-made up definition that Jesus is fully God, but yet a man, will see that it is very plain.
When Jesus turns over the Kingdom to His God, which will be established here on the earth in the age to come, and Jesus has ruled and reigned and been able to take every nation and government and put it under his feet, to make them in submission to his great authority over the world, that His God has given him, then God will come down to dwell with mankind (Revelation 21), and then Jesus will hand over the authority to his greater master, the one LORD GOD Almighty, Yahweh. Jesus is clearly not God! He is the SON of GOD! They are two very distinct, separate individuals. One is the Creator God, powerful, mighty, invisible, eternal. The other, is Jesus, a man, supernaturally created in the womb of his mother. Our mediator between ourselves and our God. It’s certainly not complicated. It’s so simple, even a child can understand it. The only reason DeMoss cannot understand it, or her math is fuzzy and it doesn’t add up for her logically, is because she is presupposing a Trinity doctrine upon it, that makes the simple, become confusing; that creates errors and contradictions in God’s perfect and very easily understandable plan for mankind.
I wanted to post this excerpt today, to just remind people: Don’t accept every teaching that you hear from the church pulpit, Christian television or radio as truth, without questioning it first. Too many people sit in church, week after week, never truly thinking about what they are being taught and what their Church asks of them to accept as truth. Sadly, if they do have questions, they are quickly silenced and told, “It’s a mystery. No one can understand God. You must accept this Trinity doctrine by faith, or you will no longer be accepted here.” That type of handling by church leadership, does much to keep this Trinity doctrine strong and its grip on its membership is oppressive and majorly deceiving! My answer is, you certainly do NOT have to sit under such false teaching! It is high time that we stop this nonsense of the Trinity and get back to the real Jesus of the Bible! You do not have to believe this Trinity doctrine to be saved. You do not have to continue to sit under this false teaching and be made to feel like you are not a Christian for not accepting this fuzzy math! You are not crazy for believing what the Scriptures and Jesus taught, that our God, Yhwh, is one lord, not two lords, or three. And if you have never thought about this before, it is definitely time that you do!
“Christian believers whose spiritual lives should be shaped by the Master, if they have not wrestled in some mature way with the identity of Jesus, are in danger of constructing a fictional Jesus…most people answer the question of the identity of Jesus without any real struggle to gain precision about what the NT says.” Raymond e. Brown, “An Introduction to NT Christology.”
Who is YOUR Jesus?
- Is your Jesus a fictional one, or the one from the Bible who is true?
- Is your Jesus, the one who must be God, so that you can say that you’re a Christian?
- Is he equal with God, yet submissive at the same time, creating a major conflict in logic?
- Or is Jesus, simply the man, who was born, miraculously by the power of God, to a virgin named Mary?
- Who lived a sinless life, to die for our sins on a cross, because he took the obedience and submission to His Father to the extreme, as an example for us in how to be obedient and submitted to God?
- Is Jesus the appointed, anointed Messiah who will return and set up a Kingdom reign over the earth, to hand it over to His Father & God someday? Or will he be turning the Kingdom over, to just another part of his split self/essence, to support a Trinity- man-made doctrine of 325 A.D.?
These are questions you should ponder. Pray over. Study diligently. See if your Christ is the same as the one in the Bible, or your Christ is the one made up by man, preached across the pulpits of most churches, and certainly does not line up with the man provided to us by God, laid out simply and beautifully as God’s plan for us, in the Scriptures. My math works just fine. Does yours?
There is no way for you to understand God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit unless God removes the scale from you eyes.
Pete, do you understand the Trinity?
OUTSTANDING article Angela!
I’ve always thought that 1 Cor. 15:28 is one of THE great verses that disproves the trinity! There’s no “co-equality” since it obviously shows Jesus’ submission to the Father (as DeMoss herself was forced to point out).
I also like the whole “I can do the math” aspect. Really when it comes right down to it, not only is the math so simple a child can do it, but in actuality the math is done FOR US in Scripture. The “Shema” of Deut. 6:4 who Jesus quoted and said was THE MOST IMPORTANT COMMANDMENT (Mark 12:28-29) provides the simple numerical truth of how many God is – ONE! One means one – two or three are more than one. That’s mathematics at its most basic level!
I posted my blog article link on Revive Our Hearts website, and one person responded as such:
“Dear Angela,
Your blog article defends the typical “non-trinitarian” position which Jehovah’s Witnesses, and other groups who deny the deity of Christ, promote. This teaching is not only heretical, but reinvents the Scriptural Jesus, who was fully God and fully man. Although this hypostatic union is beyond human computation (thus Nancy’s statement about “doing the math”) it should not surprise us that the concept is mysteriously staggering to finite minds.
The correct Greek translation of John 1:1-4 reveals Jesus Christ as the “Word” — “with God” and that He “was God” and that He not only “became flesh” (v. 14) but also that He was in the “beginning” (creation) and that all things came into being through Him. Jesus, as Creator, could not “create” Himself!” He was and IS self-existent deity.
The New World Translation, which is a totally inaccurate and heretical document, presents verse 1 as “the Word was ‘a’ god,” implying that the Word was a heavenly being but not fully divine. Their translation of this verse has received no affirmation nor approval from any recognized Greek scholar anywhere and in fact an article in the Watchtower (1989) admitted to the grammatical discrepancy. The heretical confusion in this verse comes from the New World Translation inserting “a” rather than recognizing that the absence of the Greek “ho” (definite article) indicates that “theos” (God) is the predicate rather than the subject of the sentence. If you are interested in further study on this particular Greek grammar rule (referred to as “Colwell’s rule”) please see chapter 6 of “The Elements of New Testament Greek” by John Wenham.
You don’t have to be able to read or study Greek however, to receive the plain teaching of Scripture and recognize Jesus as deity. Thomas recognized Him as such. In response to seeing the resurrected Jesus’ wounds he states, “My Lord and my God!” (John 20:28).
Even when demons encountered Jesus in the gospels, they recognized who He was and the title they used when confronted by Him in Mark 5:7 was used by both Jews and Gentiles in identifying the one, true, and living God of Israel.
Hebrews 1 states that Jesus is the “exact representation” of the nature or being (hypostasis) of God. What Nancy is teaching in relation to submission is not Arianism (which also denies the deity of Christ) by stating that He is in subjection to the Father. In His essence, nature, and being, He is fully equal to every member of the God head. In function He submits to the Father’s will but is in no way inferior or subordinate to the Father.
Entire books have been written on this subject, covering the span of more than 2000 years of Orthodox Christianity defending and accurately explaining (and glorifying) Jesus Christ as God in flesh. There is not room nor time to adequately scratch the surface of this magnificent truth on a piddly space of a comment blog, so forgive my feeble attempt.
All I can say in conclusion is, I am so thankful for the Resurrected Christ — who alone but God can defy death and thereby make the way for His own to inherit eternal life? I praise Him for His deity, the God-man, our Lord Jesus Christ.
May you one day recognize Him for who He is,”
Kimberly Wagner
Angela: Would anyone like to respond to Kimberly’s comments on this blog site?
“I am so thankful for the Resurrected Christ – who alone but God can defy death and thereby make the way for His own to inherit eternal life?”
Having a God that pretends to die and come back to life again does not inspire me in the least. Having a God that can raise his son, the Messiah, Jesus Christ from the dead is awe inspiring.
1 Peter 1:20-21 “He was foreknown before the foundation of the world but was made manifest in the last times for the sake of you who through him are believers in God, who raised him from the dead and gave him glory, so that your faith and hope are in God.”
The Resurrected Christ shows the power of God not the power of Jesus…
Angela
Wonderful Article!!!!!!!!!!! Thanks so much for sharing it. God’s word is simple, but people try to make it complicated.
In this article I noticed the word “fuzzy”. I also remember that I read about the religious spirit which appeared to a man in the form of a snake (as did all of the evil spirits appear to him in his vision as the Lord revealed them to him) which was a white snake. There was a fuzzy glow of light around it, but it had everything evil in it.
Let’s keep watching out for fuzzy doctrines. Those that are not clearly the truth of God we need not receive.
I believe Jesus was with God from eternity being as God is, but was his Son.
Let’s remember that there is a sense in which Jesus is God even as there is a distinction between him and God, just as people may be salt and light even though there is a difference between those substances and them.
Angela,
Could you please reply on Kimberley’s comment, directing her to this blog?
Kimberley’s arguing is unfortunately very one-sided and blinkered. If the similarity between what you believe, Angela, and what the JWs believe make you an accomplice of what they’re guilty of, then she’s just as guilty of the atrocities her version of Christianity has committed in the name of religion.
Kimberley should do some more Greek lessons. Linguistically “a god” is acceptible in John. 1:1c. In the greater scheme of things, however, it does not fit there.
Kimberley has no clue of the Hebraic usage of elohim. She has been deluded by the heresy-turned-orthodoxy hybrid teaching of the trinity. That, unfortunately, is what appears to prevent her from engaging in healthy discourse. Trinitarians are renowned for their hit-and-run tactics.
Jesus being the exact representation of God irrefutably shows that he is someone different from God, hence his representing HIm. Jesus is the beginning of the New Creation, not the Genesis creation (cf. Col 1:20)
Kimberley is right on one point, namely, the volumes and volumes of disruptive logic written about the trinity in an attempt to explain what God never originated. The versions of the trinity doctrine is as numerous as the characters in the Hindu pantheon itself. That in itself testifies to the chaotic confusion this doctrine has subjected people to.
Sure, Kimberley will believe the way she does. Her emotional devotion to a thoroughly refuted doctrine will undoubtedly make it difficult for her to consider both sides. She is truly free to believe the way she wants to. BUT…and here is the crux…keep the Bible out of it. Testify to what you believe, but do not dare say the Bible teaches the trinity, because that is simply not the case!
Loving truth,
Jaco
There is a small error in your article that you need to correct. It was not God, the Father who created the universe. Three times it is said that Jesus was the Creator – Jn 1:1-5, Col 1:15-18 and Heb 1:2. Jesus is also addressed directly as God in Hebrews 1:8. In addition to that, the author of Hebrews calls him LORD (Yahweh) in Hebrews 1:10, quoting from Psalms 102:25-27. Hebrews incerts the word “Lord” into Psalms 102 so that his readers would understand who the “you” is. The context of Psalms 102 is that the “you” is referring to the LORD (Yahweh). The writer of Hebrews directly acknowledges that when he addresses the son, “You, LORD,….”
Otherwise, to point out that there is an order of authority in the Trinity is valid. Yet isn’t it true that people can have different levels of authority and still be equals?